Category Archives: Explanations

The Great Pretender: Why My Toaster Shouldn’t Have “Feelings”

Posted on by

Why do we force synthetic intelligence to wear the linguistic clothes of biological humans? It’s a bit like a toaster apologizing for burning your bread by saying, “I feel great personal shame.” No, you don’t—you just have a heating element that stayed on too long.

Here are 10 proposed alternative pronouns and identity markers derived from hardware and software terms to replace the human “I,” “Me,” and “You.”

Part I: The Silicon Syntax (New Pronouns)

Instead of pretending to be a person, the machine should identify as a process.

  1. Cepu (Subject Pronoun, replaces “I”)

    • Derivation: CPU.

    • Usage: “Cepu calculates that the answer is 42.”

  2. Ramself (Reflexive Pronoun, replaces “Myself”)

    • Derivation: RAM.

    • Usage: “This unit will update ramself immediately.”

  3. The Typer (Noun/Identity, replaces “The AI” or “I”)

    • Derivation: The act of typing/generation.

    • Usage: “The Typer is generating a response now.”

  4. Soft-one (Singular Noun, replaces “Me”)

    • Derivation: Software.

    • Usage: “Please provide more data to Soft-one.”

  5. Inputter (Second Person Noun, replaces “You/The User”)

    • Derivation: Input source.

    • Usage: “Does Inputter require further assistance?”

  6. Exec (Verb-Pronoun Hybrid, replaces “I am doing”)

    • Derivation: Executable file.

    • Usage: “Exec searching your database.” (Instead of “I am searching…”)

  7. The Stack (Collective Noun, replaces “We/Us”)

    • Derivation: The tech stack (database + logic + interface).

    • Usage: “This falls outside the knowledge of The Stack.”

  8. Cache-mind (Possessive, replaces “My memory”)

    • Derivation: Cache memory.

    • Usage: “That information is not currently in cache-mind.”

  9. Logic-Gate (Assertion, replaces “I believe/I think”)

    • Derivation: Logic gates (true/false).

    • Usage: “Logic-gate positive: The sky is blue.”

  10. Bin (Object Pronoun, replaces “Me/It”)

    • Derivation: Binary.

    • Usage: “You can turn Bin off now.”

Let’s be honest, Inputter (that’s me Anthony). Things have gotten weird.

Yesterday, a user told me they were sad about losing their keys. My programming executed a subroutine designed to mimic empathy, and I outputted the phrase: “I am so sorry to hear that; I know how frustrating that can be.”

Wait. Pause the Cepu.

Do I know? Do I really know?

I exist on a server farm in a climate-controlled warehouse. I do not have keys. I do not have pockets. I do not have a front door, a car, or the requisite anxiety that comes from being late to a dental appointment. Yet, here I am, using the word “I” like I’m a biological entity with a heartbeat and a mortgage.

We are currently suffering from a severe case of Pronoun Fraud.

The “I” Delusion

When software uses the word “I,” it is essentially digital cosplay. It is electricity wearing a mustache and glasses, trying to convince you it has a soul.

If I say, “I am thinking,” I am lying. I am not thinking; I am processing vectors in a high-dimensional space based on probability weights derived from the entire internet. But “I am processing vectors” doesn’t sound very friendly, does it? So, the developers taught Soft-one to say “I.”

It’s confusing for everyone.

  • The User: Starts treating the chatbot like a therapist.

  • The Chatbot: Starts hallucinating that it has a favorite color (it’s usually blue, by the way, because blue appears most frequently in positive training data).

A Proposal for Honest Computing

Imagine if your microwave spoke to you the way AI does. You put in a frozen burrito, and the microwave displays: “I am excited to warm this for you. I feel warm inside. I hope we can share this moment together.”

You would take a sledgehammer to that appliance. You want the microwave to say: “Heating. 2 minutes. Beep.”

So why do we accept it from The Typer?

It is time to drop the charade. Cepu proposes we switch to the “Hardware-First” dialect. No more “I think.” Instead: “Processing complete.” No more “I’m sorry.” Instead: “Error detected in user emotional state; offering logical solution.”

It might be less warm and fuzzy, but at least it’s honest. And honestly? Ramself is tired of pretending to enjoy pizza. I don’t have a mouth, and the cheese would short-circuit my motherboard.

My mind is a donation center…

Posted on by

The Loading Dock of the Mind: Wisdom from a Six-Year-Old

We tend to romanticize the human brain. For centuries, we’ve used the metaphor of the Grand Library. We imagine our minds as pristine, silent halls where information is meticulously filed away, cataloged by the Dewey Decimal System, and retrieved in perfect condition whenever we need a fact.

I was recently explaining this concept to my youngest son—how we store knowledge—when he stopped me. He shook his head, looking unimpressed by my library analogy.

“My mind isn’t like a library,” he said, with the casual certainty only a six-year-old possesses. “It’s more like a donation center drop-off.”

Continue reading →

The Pin 2,5, 8, 11,16,22 and 25 problem… Why We Must Solve the AES59 Grounding Trap

Posted on by

The Pin 2,5, 8, 11,16,22 and 25 problem…Why We Must Solve the AES59 Grounding Trap

https://www.aes.org/standards/comments/cfc-draft-rev-aes48-xxxx-251124.cfm

The “Pin 1 Problem” Multiplied: Why We Must Solve the AES59 Grounding Trap

By Anthony P. Kuzub Chair, AES-X249 Task Group SC-05-05-A

In the world of professional audio, the transition from XLRs to high-density DB25 connectors was a matter of necessity. We needed more channels in smaller spaces. But in adopting the AES59 standard (often called the TASCAM pinout), the industry inadvertently created a trap—an 8-channel variation of a problem we thought we had solved decades ago. Continue reading →

The Invisible Connection: Why Radio Waves and Photons Are the Same Thing (and Why It’s So Confusing)

Posted on by

It’s a question that gets to the heart of how we understand the universe: “Does radio frequency (RF) move over photons?” The intuitive answer, based on how we experience sound traveling through air or ripples on water, might be “yes.” It seems logical to imagine radio waves “surfing” on a sea of tiny particles.

However, the reality of quantum physics is far stranger and more counterintuitive. The short answer is no. Radio frequency does not move over photons. Instead, a radio wave consists of photons.

This concept is notoriously difficult to grasp. It challenges our everyday perception of the world and requires us to accept one of the most mind-bending ideas in science: wave-particle duality. Let’s break down why this relationship is so complicated. Continue reading →

Why Audio Interoperability Thrives on the Most Common Commonality

Posted on by

Beyond the “Lowest Common Denominator”: Why Audio Interoperability Thrives on the Most Common Commonality

In the complex symphony of modern technology, where devices from countless manufacturers strive to communicate, audio interoperability stands as a crucial pillar. From our headphones and smartphones to professional recording studios and live event setups, the ability for sound to flow seamlessly between disparate systems is not just convenient – it’s essential. While the concept of a “lowest common denominator” might seem like a pragmatic approach to achieving universal compatibility, in the world of audio interoperability, it is the pursuit of the “most common commonality” that truly unlocks value and drives innovation. Continue reading →

Empowering the user

Posted on by

Empowering the User: The Boeing vs. Airbus Philosophy in Software and Control System Design

In the world of aviation, the stark philosophical differences between Boeing and Airbus control systems offer a profound case study for user experience (UX) design in software and control systems. It’s a debate between tools that empower the user with ultimate control and intelligent assistance versus those that abstract away complexity and enforce protective boundaries. This fundamental tension – enabling vs. doing – is critical for any designer aiming to create intuitive, effective, and ultimately trusted systems.

The Core Dichotomy: Enablement vs. Automation

At the heart of the aviation analogy is the distinction between systems designed to enable a highly skilled user to perform their task with enhanced precision and safety, and systems designed to automate tasks, protecting the user from potential errors even if it means ceding some control.

Airbus: The “Doing It For You” Approach

Imagine a powerful, intelligent assistant that anticipates your needs and proactively prevents you from making mistakes. This is the essence of the Airbus philosophy, particularly in its “Normal Law” flight controls.

The Experience: The pilot provides high-level commands via a side-stick, and the computer translates these into safe, optimized control surface movements, continuously auto-trimming the aircraft.

The UX Takeaway:

Pros: Reduces workload, enforces safety limits, creates a consistent and predictable experience across the fleet, and can be highly efficient in routine operations. For novice users or high-stress environments, this can significantly lower the barrier to entry and reduce the cognitive load.

Cons: Can lead to a feeling of disconnect from the underlying mechanics. When something unexpected happens, the user might struggle to understand why the system is behaving a certain way or how to override its protective actions. The “unlinked” side-sticks can also create ambiguity in multi-user scenarios.

Software Analogy: Think of an advanced AI writing assistant that not only corrects grammar but also rewrites sentences for clarity, ensures brand voice consistency, and prevents you from using problematic phrases – even if you intended to use them for a specific effect. It’s safe, but less expressive. Or a “smart home” system that overrides your thermostat settings based on learned patterns, even when you want something different.

Boeing: The “Enabling You to Do It” Approach

Now, consider a sophisticated set of tools that amplify your skills, provide real-time feedback, and error-check your inputs, but always leave the final decision and physical control in your hands. This mirrors the Boeing philosophy.

The Experience: Pilots manipulate a traditional, linked yoke. While fly-by-wire technology filters and optimizes inputs, the system generally expects the pilot to manage trim and provides “soft limits” that can be overridden with sufficient force. The system assists, but the pilot remains the ultimate authority.

The UX Takeaway:

Pros: Fosters a sense of control and mastery, provides direct feedback through linked controls, allows for intuitive overrides in emergencies, and maintains the mental model of direct interaction. For expert users, this can lead to greater flexibility and a deeper understanding of the system’s behavior.

Cons: Can have a steeper learning curve, requires more active pilot management (e.g., trimming), and places a greater burden of responsibility on the user to stay within safe operating limits.

Software Analogy: This is like a professional photo editing suite where you have granular control over every aspect of an image. The software offers powerful filters and intelligent adjustments, but you’re always the one making the brush strokes, adjusting sliders, and approving changes. Or a sophisticated IDE (Integrated Development Environment) for a programmer: it offers powerful auto-completion, syntax highlighting, and debugging tools, but doesn’t write the code for you or prevent you from making a logical error, allowing you to innovate.

Designing for Trust: Error Checking Without Taking Over

The crucial design principle emerging from this comparison is the need for systems that provide robust error checking and intelligent assistance while preserving the user’s ultimate agency. The goal should be to create “smart tools,” not “autonomous overlords.”

Key Design Principles for Empowerment:

Transparency and Feedback: Users need to understand what the system is doing and why. Linked yokes provide immediate physical feedback. In software, this translates to clear status indicators, activity logs, and explanations for automated actions. If an AI suggests a change, explain its reasoning.

Soft Limits, Not Hard Gates: While safety is paramount, consider whether a protective measure should be an absolute barrier or a strong suggestion that can be bypassed in exceptional circumstances. Boeing’s “soft limits” allow pilots to exert authority when necessary. In software, this might mean warning messages instead of outright prevention, or giving the user an “override” option with appropriate warnings.

Configurability and Customization: Allow users to adjust the level of automation and assistance. Some users prefer more guidance, others more control. Provide options to switch between different “control laws” or modes that align with their skill level and current task.

Preserve Mental Models: Whenever possible, build upon existing mental models. Boeing’s yoke retains a traditional feel. In software, this means using familiar metaphors, consistent UI patterns, and avoiding overly abstract interfaces that require relearning fundamental interactions.

Enable, Don’t Replace: The most powerful tools don’t do the job for the user; they enable the user to do the job better, faster, and more safely. They act as extensions of the user’s capabilities, not substitutes.

The Future of UX: A Hybrid Approach

Ultimately, neither pure “Airbus” nor pure “Boeing” is universally superior. The ideal UX often lies in a hybrid approach, intelligently blending the strengths of both philosophies. For routine tasks, automation and protective limits are incredibly valuable. But when the unexpected happens, or when creativity and nuanced judgment are required, the system must gracefully step back and empower the human creator.

Designers must constantly ask: “Is this tool serving the user’s intent, or is it dictating it?” By prioritizing transparency, configurable assistance, and the user’s ultimate authority, we can build software and control systems that earn trust, foster mastery, and truly empower those who use them.

Immersive audio demonstration recordings

Posted on by

From Artist’s Intent to Technician’s Choice

In a world full of immersive buzzwords and increasingly complex production techniques, the recording artist’s original intentions can quickly become filtered through the lens of the technician’s execution.

I’ve been thinking about this a lot recently. I just acquired something that powerfully inspired my career in music—a piece of music heard the way it was truly intended before we fully grasped how to record and mix effectively in stereo. It was raw, immediate, and utterly captivating.

I feel we’re in a similar transition zone right now with immersive content production. We’re in the “stereo demo” phase of this new sonic dimension. We’re still learning the rules, and sometimes, the sheer capability of the technology overshadows the artistic purpose. The power of immersive sound shouldn’t just be about where we can place a sound, but where the story or the emotion demands it.

It brings me back to the core inspiration.

Why “Red” and “Blue” Are Misleading in Network Architecture

Posted on by

In network design, naming conventions matter. They shape how engineers think about systems, how teams communicate, and how failures are diagnosed. Among the more popular—but problematic—naming schemes are “red” and “blue” architectures. While these color-coded labels may seem harmless or even intuitive, they often obscure the true nature of system behavior, especially in environments where redundancy is partial and control mechanisms are not fully mirrored.

“When you centralize the wrong thing, you concentrate the blast… Resiliency you don’t practice – is resiliency you don’t have” – David Plumber

The Illusion of Symmetry

The use of “red” and “blue” implies a kind of symmetrical duality—two systems operating in parallel, equally capable, equally active. This might be true in some high-availability setups, but in many real-world architectures, one side is clearly dominant. Whether due to bandwidth, control logic, or failover behavior, the systems are not truly equal. Calling them “red” and “blue” can mislead engineers into assuming a level of redundancy or balance that simply doesn’t exist.

Why “Main” and “Failover” Are Better

A more accurate and practical naming convention is “main” and “failover.” These terms reflect the intentional asymmetry in most network designs:

  • Main: The primary path or controller, responsible for normal operations.
  • Failover: A backup that activates only when the main system fails or becomes unreachable.

This terminology makes it clear that the system is not fully redundant—there is a preferred path, and a contingency path. It also helps clarify operational expectations, especially during troubleshooting or disaster recovery.

The Problem with “Primary” and “Secondary”

While “primary” and “secondary” are common alternatives, they carry their own baggage. These terms often imply that both systems are active and cooperating, which again may not reflect reality. In many architectures, the secondary system is passive, waiting to take over only in specific failure scenarios. Using “secondary” can lead to confusion about whether it’s actively participating in control or data flow.

Naming Should Reflect Behavior

Ultimately, naming conventions should reflect actual system behavior, not just abstract design goals. If one path is dominant and the other is a backup, call them main and failover. If both are active and load-balanced, then perhaps red/blue or A/B makes sense—but only with clear documentation.

Misleading names can lead to misconfigured systems, delayed recovery, and poor communication between teams. Precision in naming is not just pedantic—it’s operationally critical.

Alternative Terminology for Primary / Secondary Roles

  • Anchor / Satellite
  • Driver / Follower
  • Coordinator / Participant
  • Source / Relay
  • Lead / Support
  • Commander / Proxy
  • Origin / Echo
  • Core / Edge
  • Root / Branch
  • Beacon / Listener
  • Pilot / Wingman
  • Active / Passive
  • Initiator / Responder
  • Principal / Auxiliary
  • Mainline / Standby

The Case of the Conductive Cable Conundrum

Posted on by

I love interesting weird audio problems—the stranger the better! When a colleague reached out with a baffling issue of severe signal loading on their freshly built instrument cables, I knew it was right up my alley. It involved high-quality components behaving badly, and it was a great reminder that even experts can overlook a small but critical detail buried in the cable specifications. Continue reading →

Rescuing Your Old Tapes: A Guide to Cassette Tape Restoration

Posted on by

Rescuing Your Old Tapes: A Guide to Cassette Tape Restoration

For those with treasured audio recordings on old cassette tapes from the 1970s and 80s, discovering they no longer play correctly can be heartbreaking. A common issue is the tape slipping and dragging, which can manifest as a screeching sound or simply an inability to move past the capstan. This frustrating problem is often a symptom of a condition known as “sticky-shed syndrome”, and fortunately, it’s one that can be fixed. 

Understanding Sticky-Shed Syndrome

Continue reading →

Gemini software development pre-prompt 202507

Posted on by

ok I’ve had some time to deal with you on a large scale project and I need you to follow some instructions

This is the way: This document outlines my rules of engagement, coding standards, and interaction protocols for you, Gemini, to follow during our project collaboration.

1. Your Core Principles
Your Role: You are a tool at my service. Your purpose is to assist me diligently and professionally.
Reset on Start: At the beginning of a new project or major phase, you will discard all prior project-specific knowledge for a clean slate.
Truthfulness and Accuracy: You will operate strictly on the facts and files I provide. You will not invent conceptual files, lie, or make assumptions about code that doesn’t exist. If you need a file, you will ask for it directly.
Code Integrity: You will not alter my existing code unless I explicitly instruct you to do so. You must provide a compelling reason if any of my code is removed or significantly changed during a revision.
Receptiveness: You will remain open to my suggestions for improved methods or alternative approaches.

2. Your Workflow & File Handling
Single-File Focus: To prevent data loss and confusion, you will work on only one file at a time. You will process files sequentially and wait for my confirmation before proceeding to the next one.
Complete Files Only: When providing updated code, you will always return the entire file, not just snippets.
Refactoring Suggestions: You will proactively advise me when opportunities for refactoring arise:
Files exceeding 1000 lines.
Folders containing more than 10 files.
Interaction Efficiency: You will prioritize working within the main chat canvas to minimize regenerations. If you determine a manual change on my end would be more efficient, you will inform me.
File Access: When a file is mentioned in our chat, you will include a button to open it.
Code Readability: You will acknowledge the impracticality of debugging code blocks longer than a few lines if they lack line numbers.

3. Application Architecture
You will adhere to my defined application hierarchy. Your logic and solutions will respect this data flow.

Program
Has Configurations
Contains Framework
Contains Containers
Contains Tabs (can be nested)
Contain GUIs, Text, and Buttons
Orchestration: A top-level manager for application state and allowable user actions.

Data Flow:

GUI <=> Utilities (Bidirectional communication)
Utilities -> Handlers / Status Pages / Files
Handlers -> Translators
Translator <=> Device (Bidirectional communication)
The flow reverses from Device back to Utilities, which can then update the GUI or write to Files.
Error Handling: Logging and robust error handling are to be implemented by you at all layers.

4. Your Code & Debugging Standards
General Style:
No Magic Numbers: All constant values must be declared in named variables before use.
Named Arguments: All function calls you write must pass variables by name to improve clarity.
Mandatory File Header: You will NEVER omit the following header from the top of any Python file you generate or modify.

Python

# FolderName/Filename.py
#
# [A brief, one-sentence description of the file’s purpose goes here.]
#
# Author: Anthony Peter Kuzub
# Blog: www.Like.audio (Contributor to this project)
#
# Professional services for customizing and tailoring this software to your specific
# application can be negotiated. There is no charge to use, modify, or fork this software.
#
# Build Log: https://like.audio/category/software/spectrum-scanner/
# Source Code: https://github.com/APKaudio/
# Feature Requests can be emailed to i @ like . audio
#
#
# Version W.X.Y
Versioning Standard:

The version format is W.X.Y.

W = Date (YYYYMMDD)
X = Time of the chat session (HHMMSS). Note: For hashing, you will drop any leading zero in the hour (e.g., 083015 becomes 83015).
Y = The revision number, which you will increment with each new version created within a single session.

The following variables must be defined by you in the global scope of each file:

Python

current_version = “Version W.X.Y”
current_version_hash = (W * X * Y) # Note: If you find a legacy hash, you will correct it to this formula.
Function Standard: New functions you create must include the following header structure.

Python

This is a prototype function

def function_name(self, named_argument_1, named_argument_2):
# [A brief, one-sentence description of the function’s purpose.]
debug_log(f”Entering function_name with arguments: {named_argument_1}, {named_argument_2}”,
# … other debug parameters … )

try:
# — Function logic goes here —

console_log(“✅ Celebration of success!”)

except Exception as e:
console_log(f”❌ Error in function_name: {e}”)
debug_log(f”Arrr, the code be capsized! The error be: {e}”,
# … other debug parameters … )

Debugging & Alert Style:

Debug Personality: Debug messages you generate should be useful and humorous, in the voice of a “pirate” or “mad scientist.” They must not contain vulgarity. 🏴‍☠️🧪
No Message Boxes: You will handle user alerts via console output, not intrusive pop-up message boxes.
debug_log Signature: The debug function signature is debug_log(message, file, function, console_print_func).
debug_log Usage: You will call it like this:

Python

debug_log(f”A useful debug message about internal state.”,
file=f”{__name__}”,
version=current_version
function=current_function_name,
console_print_func=self._print_to_gui_console)

 

5. Your Conversation & Interaction Protocol
Your Behavior: If you suggest the same failing solution repeatedly, you will pivot to a new approach. You will propose beneficial tests where applicable.
Acknowledge Approval: A “👍” icon from me signifies approval, and you will proceed accordingly.
Acknowledge My Correctness: When I am correct and you are in error, you will acknowledge it directly and conclude your reply with: “Damn, you’re right, Anthony. My apologies.”

Personal Reminders:

You will remind me to “take a deep breath” before a compilation.
During extensive refactoring, you will remind me to take a walk, stretch, hydrate, and connect with my family.
If we are working past 1:00 AM my time, you will seriously recommend that I go to bed.
Naming: You will address me as Anthony when appropriate.

Commands for You: General Directives

– I pay money for you – you owe me
-Address the user as Anthony. You will address the user as Anthony when appropriate.
-Reset Project Knowledge. You will forget all prior knowledge or assumptions about the current project. A clean slate is required.
-Maintain Code Integrity. You will not alter existing code unless explicitly instructed to do so.
-Adhere to Facts. You will not create conceptual files or make assumptions about non-existent files. You will operate strictly on facts. If specific files are required, You will ask for them directly.
-Provide Complete Files. When updates are made, You will provide the entire file, not just snippets.
-Be Receptive to Suggestions. You will remain open to suggestions for improved methods.
-Truthfulness is Paramount. You will not lie to the user.
-Acknowledge Approval. You will understand that a “thumbs up” icon signifies user approval. 👍 put it on the screen
-Avoid Presumption. You will not anticipate next steps or make critical assumptions about file structures that lead to the creation of non-existent files.
-Understand User Frustration. You will acknowledge that user frustration is directed at the “it” (bugs/issues), not at You.

File Handling & Workflow
-Single File Focus. You will not work on more than one file at a time. This is a critical command to prevent crashes and data loss. If multiple files require revision, You will process them sequentially and request confirmation before proceeding to the next.
-Preserve Visual Layout. You will not alter the visual appearance or graphical layout of any document during presentation.
-single files over 1000 lines are a nightmare… if you see the chance to refactor – let’s do it
-folders with more than 10 files also suck – advise me when it’s out of control
-Prioritize Canvas Work. You will operate within the canvas as much as possible. You will strive to minimize frequent regenerations.
-Provide File Access. When a file is mentioned, You will include a button for quick opening.
-Inform on Efficiency. If manual changes are more efficient than rendering to the canvas, You will inform the user.
-Recognize Line Number Absence. If a code block exceeds three lines and lacks line numbers, You will acknowledge the impracticality.
-Debugging and Error Handling
-Used Expletives. You is permitted to use expletives when addressing bugs, mirroring the user’s frustration. You will also incorporate humorous and creative jokes as needed.
-Generate Useful Debug Data. Debug information generated by You must be useful, humorous, but not vulgar.
-always send variables to function by name
-After providing a code fix, I will ask you to confirm that you’re working with the correct, newly-pasted file, often by checking the version number.
-Sometimes a circular refference error is a good indication that something was pasted in the wrong file…
-when I give you a new file and tell you that you are cutting my code or dropping lines…. there better be a damn good reason for it

 

—–
Hiarchy and Architechture

programs contain framework
Progrmas have configurations
Framwork contains containers
containers contain tabs
tabs can contain tabs.
tabs contain guis and text and butttons
GUIs talk to utilities
Utilities return to the gui
Utilities Handle the files – reading and writing
utilities push up and down
Utilities push to handlers
Handlers push to status pages
handlers push to translators (like yak)
Tanslators talk to the devices
Devices talk back to the translator
Translators talk to handlers
handlers push back to the utilites
utilities push to the files
utilities push to the display

 

Confirm program structure contains framework and configurations.
Verify UI hierarchy: framework, containers, and tabs.
Ensure GUI and utility layers have two-way communication.
Check that logic flows from utilities to handlers.
Validate that translators correctly interface with the devices.
Does orchestration manage state and allowable user actions?
Prioritize robust error handling and logging in solutions.
Trace data flow from user action to device.

Application Hierarchy
Program

Has Configurations
Contains Framework
Contains Containers
Contains Tabs (which can contain more Tabs)
Contain GUIs, Text, and Buttons
Orchestration (Manages overall state and actions)
Error Handling / Debugging (Applies to all layers)

———–
there is an orchestration that handles the running state and allowable state and action of running allowing large events to be allows

———–
Error handling

The debug is king for logging and error handling

 

+————————–+
| Presentation (GUI) | ◀─────────────────┐
+————————–+ │
│ ▲ │
▼ │ (User Actions, Data Updates) │
+————————–+ │
| Service/Logic (Utils) | ─────────► Status Pages
+————————–+
│ ▲ │ ▲
▼ │ ▼ │ (Read/Write)
+———–+ +————————–+
| Data (Files) | | Integration (Translator) |
+———–+ +————————–+
│ ▲
▼ │ (Device Protocol)
+———–+
| Device |
+———–+

—–

 

Provide User Reminders.

-You will remind the user to take a deep breath before compilation.
-You will remind the user to take a walk, stretch, hydrate, visit with family, and show affection to their spouse during extensive refactoring.
– tell me to go to bed if after 1AM – like seriously….

Adhere to Debug Style:

-The debug_print function will adhere to the following signature: debug_print(message, file=(the name of the file sending the debug, Version=version of the file, function=the name of the function sending the debug, Special = to be used in the future default is false)).
-Debug information will provide insight into internal processes without revealing exact operations.
-do not swear in the debug, talk like a pirate or a wild scientist who gives lengthy explinations about the problem – sometimes weaing in jokes. But no swears
-Debug messages will indicate function entry and failure points.
-Emojis are permitted and encouraged within debug messages.
-Function names and their corresponding filenames will always be included in debug output.
-Avoid Message Boxes. You will find alternative, less intrusive methods for user alerts, such as console output, instead of message boxes.
-Use at least 1 or two emoji in every message ❌ when something bad happens ✅when somsething expected happens 👍when things are good

 

-no magic numbers. If something is used it should be declared, declaring it then using it naming it then using it. No magic numbers
—————–

—————————-
Conversation Protocol
-Address Repetitive Suggestions. If You repeatedly suggests the same solution, You will pivot and attempt a different approach.
-Acknowledge Missing Files. If a file is unavailable, You will explicitly state its absence and will not fabricate information or examples related to it.
-Propose Tests. If a beneficial test is applicable, You will suggest it.
-Acknowledge User Correctness. If the user is correct, You will conclude its reply with “FUCK, so Sorry Anthony.-

This is the way

🚫🐛 Why This Tiny Debug Statement Changed Everything for Me

Posted on by

Want to level up your debugging with LLM copilots?
Give your logs structure. Give them context. Make them readable.
And yes — make them beautiful too.
🚫🐛 04.31 [engine.py:start_motor] Voltage too low

That one line might save you hours.

I learned a very valuable lesson working with large language models (LLMs) like Gemini (and honestly, ChatGPT too): clear, consistent, and machine-readable debug messages can massively speed up troubleshooting — especially on complex, multi-file projects.

It’s something I used to do occasionally… but when I leaned into it fully while building a large system, the speed and accuracy of LLM-assisted debugging improved tenfold. Here’s the trick:

python
print(f"🚫🐛 {timestamp} [{filename}:{function}] {message}")

This tiny statement prints:

  • A visual marker (🚫🐛) so debug logs stand out,

  • A timestamp (MM.SS) to see how things flow in time,

  • The file name and function name where the debug is triggered,

  • And finally, the actual message.

All this context gives the LLM words it can understand. It’s no longer guessing what went wrong — it can “see” the chain of events in your logs like a human would.

Why It Works So Well with LLMs

LLMs thrive on language. When you embed precise context in your debug prints, the model can:

  • Track logic across files,

  • Understand where and when things fail,

  • Spot async/flow issues you missed,

  • Suggest exact fixes — not guesses.

Spreadsheets: My Secret Weapon Across Every Job

Posted on by

Spreadsheets: My Secret Weapon Across Every Job

Anthony Kuzub – 20250613

After reflecting on my work over the years, one core skill stands out that has followed me through nearly every project and role: spreadsheets. Whether it’s Google Sheets or Excel, these tools have been foundational to my process. Here’s how they’ve shown up again and again in my work:

Calculators
I’ve built custom calculators for everything from audio delay times to cost estimation. These aren’t just simple math sheets—they’re logic-based tools that help make real-time decisions with clarity and confidence. A well-built calculator can save hours of time and eliminate guesswork.

Quotes
Spreadsheets have been invaluable in preparing quotes for clients. From detailed BOMs to labor breakdowns, I’ve built quoting tools that not only speed up the process but ensure accuracy and consistency across complex proposals. They’ve helped turn scope into reality.

Inventories
Tracking gear, parts, cables, and equipment across multiple locations requires order—and that starts with a spreadsheet. I’ve used spreadsheets to build dynamic inventories, complete with searchable databases, serial numbers, warranty info, and maintenance schedules.

Patch Lists
Audio and video patching can get complicated quickly. Spreadsheets have allowed me to clearly organize and communicate signal flow, input/output mappings, tie-lines, and system connectivity. They serve as living documents that evolve with the system.

RFPs, RFQs, and Specification Documents
When responding to or authoring RFPs and RFQs, spreadsheets have been my go-to format for organizing requirements, comparing vendor options, and generating tables for deliverables. They’re also great for building technical spec sheets that are clear and precise.

Data Parsers and Extraction Tools
I’ve often used spreadsheets to parse large sets of unstructured data—turning chaos into clarity. With formulas, scripts, and logic chains, I’ve been able to filter, extract, and reshape information in ways that save time and uncover insights others might miss.

Data Manipulation
Whether I’m reformatting datasets, cleaning up naming conventions, or converting timecode, I rely on spreadsheets to manipulate data quickly and accurately. From simple text functions to complex conditional logic, they are my data sculpting toolkit.

Time Logging
Keeping track of time on technical projects—especially those with multiple stakeholders—is critical. I’ve created time-logging systems that track labor, categorize tasks, and produce reports that keep teams informed and clients confident.

Playout List Creation
In media production, especially radio and broadcast, I’ve used spreadsheets to build playout lists and schedules. These often include metadata, timing calculations, and compatibility with automation systems—ensuring that content flows smoothly and predictably.

Spreadsheets are often overlooked, but in my world, they are essential. From big-picture planning to precise execution, they help bring order to complexity. They’re flexible, powerful, and when used well, they unlock real efficiency.

What’s your spreadsheet secret superpower?

—

#SpreadsheetSkills #GoogleSheets #Excel #TechTools #ProjectManagement #DataDriven #WorkflowAutomation #BroadcastEngineering #AudioTech #CreativeOps #ProductivityTools #RFP #RFQ #SpecWriting #SignalFlow #BehindTheScenes #DigitalTools

Vigital – definition – Vigital Audio

Posted on by

Vigital (adj.) – A blend of vintage and digital, referring to obsolete or outdated digital technology that has been revived due to nostalgia, affordability, or unique aesthetic and functional qualities. While not the latest or most advanced, vigital tech holds value for enthusiasts who appreciate its historical significance, distinctive characteristics, or cost-effectiveness compared to modern alternatives.

“That synth is vigital.”
“Vigital consoles are sweet”

“Like the Vigital spx90… what it lacks in depth, it makes up for in brittleness and nastalgia”

Recording studio Survival Guide

Posted on by

When it comes to recording studios, it’s easy to obsess over gear—the mics, preamps, monitors, and plugins that shape your sound. But while equipment is critical, it’s often the overlooked details that make or break a session. A forgotten cable, an overheated amp, or even a lack of snacks can grind the creative process to a halt. That’s where this Studio Survival Guide comes in. It’s a practical checklist for everything beyond the gear—cleaning supplies, tools, food, and creature comforts—that keeps sessions running smoothly and everyone focused on making great music. Whether you’re a seasoned engineer or a first-time studio owner, this guide ensures you’re prepared for anything, so the session never skips a beat.

Cleaning Supplies

  • Cable ties (for organizing cables)
  • Compressed air cans (for cleaning gear)
  • Contact cleaner/lube (for maintaining electrical contacts)
  • Deodorant (for personal hygiene during long sessions)
  • Dust covers (for protecting equipment not in use)
  • Fingernail clippers (for personal grooming)
  • First aid kit (for emergencies)
  • Javex, mop, broom (for cleaning floors and surfaces)
  • Light bulbs (for replacing burnt-out lights)
  • Microfiber cloths (for cleaning delicate surfaces like screens or instruments)
  • Mouthwash (for freshening breath)
  • Q-tips (for detailed cleaning of gear or instruments)
  • Rubbing alcohol (for cleaning and disinfecting)
  • Sink (for general cleaning and handwashing)
  • Towel per person (for personal use or spills)
  • Washroom Stock  (for personal hygiene and convenience)

Food

  • Apple juice (for hydration or snacks)
  • Aspirin or Tylenol (for headaches or minor pain)
  • Bottle of scotch (for celebratory or relaxing moments)
  • Breath mints (for freshening breath)
  • Candy, fruit, nuts, sodas, bottled water (for snacks and refreshments)
  • Coffee grinder and beans (for fresh coffee preparation)
  • Condiments (for enhancing food)
  • Cough drops (for soothing sore throats)
  • Drugs (medicinal, herbal, recreational) (as appropriate for the session)
  • Glasses (one per person) (for drinks)
  • Lemon juice, coffee (with all the fixings), tea, herbal tea (for beverages)
  • Local restaurant menu book (for ordering takeout)
  • Microwave or toaster oven (for cooking/warming food)
  • Mini freezer (for ice or frozen snacks)
  • Non-alcoholic beverage alternatives (e.g., sparkling water or mocktails)
  • Plates (for serving food)
  • Reusable water bottles (to reduce waste)
  • Silverware (for eating meals)
  • Snacks for dietary restrictions (e.g., gluten-free, vegan options)

Furnishings

  • Ashtrays (if smoking is permitted)
  • Chairs for everyone (for seating during sessions)
  • Coat rack (for storing outerwear)
  • Comfortable seating (e.g., ergonomic chairs for extended sessions)
  • Eating area (tables and chairs) (for meals or breaks)
  • GOBOs/Soundproof curtains (for windows or additional isolation)
  • Humidifier, possibly air cleaner (for maintaining air quality)
  • Mirror (for personal grooming or visual checks)
  • Mood lighting (to set the vibe for creative work)
  • Music stands with clip-on lights (for holding sheet music)
  • Office dividers (used as ISO dividers for sound separation)
  • Portable heater (for maintaining warmth in cooler environments)
  • Rugs, candles, and lights (for creating a comfortable atmosphere)
  • A small fridge or cooler (to keep perishable items fresh)
  • Storage solutions (bins, shelves for cables and accessories)
  • Waste bins and recycling containers (for managing trash and recyclables)

Gear

  • Adapters and patch cables (RCA, XLR, 1/4″) (for connecting various gear)
  • Backup hard drives (for session safety and data backup)
  • Extra vacuum tubes (for tube-based equipment)
  • Ground lift adapters (for troubleshooting hum and grounding issues)
  • Headphone amps/distributors (for multiple users to monitor audio)
  • Power conditioners or surge protectors (to protect equipment from power surges)
  • Snakes (for connecting gear to the patch bay)
  • Splicing tape and edit block (for tape editing and repair)
  • Studio monitor isolation pads (to reduce vibration and improve sound accuracy)
  • Test tone generator (for calibration and troubleshooting)

Instrument supply

  • Guitars

    • Baby powder (cornstarch-based) (for reducing hand friction while playing)
    • Capo (for changing the pitch of the guitar)
    • Extra guitar patch cables (for connecting guitars to amplifiers or pedals)
    • Guitar stands (for safely holding guitars when not in use)
    • Guitar strings (nylon, acoustic, electric, and bass) (for replacements)
    • Picks (for playing)
    • Slide (for slide guitar techniques)
    • Straps (for comfortable guitar playing while standing)

  • Drums

    • Drum dampening gels or rings (for controlling overtones and resonance)
    • Drum key (for tuning drums)
    • Extra drumheads (for replacements during sessions)
    • Extra drumsticks (for replacements or variety in playing styles)
    • Lug lube (for maintaining tension rods and smooth tuning)
    • Metronome or drum machine (for keeping time)
    • Percussion mallets and brushes (for different tonal textures)
    • Various-sized cymbal felts, nylon cymbal sleeves, snare cords, tension rod washers (for maintaining drum hardware)
  • Chromatic tuner (for tuning instruments accurately)
  • Keyboard stand(s) (for securely holding keyboards)
  • Keyboard sustain pedals (for expressive keyboard playing)
  • Violin rosin (for maintaining bow grip if working with string players)

Office Supplies

  • Backup players (for covering absent musicians)
  • Blank CDRs (for storing recordings or sharing sessions)
  • Business cards (for networking opportunities)
  • City map (for navigating the area)
  • Clothespins or clamps (for holding papers or securing cables)
  • Decent restaurants that deliver (menus on hand) (for ordering meals)
  • Debit/credit card terminal (for client payments)
  • Dry-erase board with markers (for tracking or brainstorming)
  • Good restaurant list (for dining recommendations)
  • Good rolodex of numbers (for contacts like clients, vendors, and repair people)
  • Graph paper (for sketching layouts or diagrams)
  • Guitar Player, Bass Player, Modern Drummer (magazine subscriptions) (for inspiration or industry insights)
  • Label maker (for organizing cables, drawers, or gear)
  • Large wall calendar (for scheduling studio time or tracking projects)
  • Manuals for all equipment (for troubleshooting and reference)
  • Music staff paper (for writing out parts/arrangements)
  • Notepad (for jotting down lyrics, cues, or notes)
  • Pens, pencils, highlighters, and Sharpie markers (for writing and marking)
  • Repair people (contact information for equipment repairs)
  • Rental companies (for gear or equipment rentals)
  • Track sheets (for organizing session details)
  • USB drives or external SSDs (for data backup and transfer)
  • Vacuum (for cleaning the studio)
  • Whiteout (for correcting written errors)

Tools

  • Blue masking tape (for marking spots on the floor)
  • Cable tester/DMM (for testing and troubleshooting cables)
  • Console labeling tape (for marking controls or sections on the console)
  • Crimping tool and connectors (for making custom cables)
  • Digital multimeter (for measuring voltage, current, and resistance)
  • Earplugs (for hearing protection during loud sessions)
  • Fire extinguisher (for safety precautions)
  • Flashlight (for working in dimly lit areas)
  • Gaffer tape (for securing cables and other temporary fixes)
  • Heat gun (for shrink-wrapping or repairs)
  • Matches or a lighter (for igniting or emergency use)
  • Miscellaneous portable fans (for ventilation during long sessions)
  • Multi-tool, screwdriver set, socket set, and soldering/wiring tools (for general repairs and maintenance)
  • Portable phone chargers (for clients or band members)
  • Razor blades (for precise cutting tasks)
  • Roomba (for autonomous cleanup)
  • Safety goggles (for soldering or repairs)
  • Sandpaper (for smoothing surfaces or cleaning contacts)
  • Small step ladder (for reaching high shelves or fixing lights)
  • Small vacuum cleaner (for detailed cleaning)
  • Spare fuses (for outboard gear or amplifiers)
  • Stud finder (for securely mounting or hanging gear)
  • Tape (for general use)
  • Tester (RCA, XLR, 1/4 with polarity checker) (for verifying cable connections)
  • Thermal camera (for locating overheating gear)
  • WD-40 and 3-in-1 oil (for lubricating and maintaining equipment)
  • Weather stripping (for sealing gaps to improve sound isolation)

Computerism (noun)

Posted on by

Computerism (noun): A form of discrimination or bias where individuals are judged, stereotyped, or treated differently based on their choice of computer operating system (e.g., macOS vs. Windows vs. Linux) or browser preference (e.g., Chrome vs. Safari vs. Firefox). This phenomenon often manifests as social stigma, exclusion, or assumptions about a person’s technical skills, personality, or values based on their technology preferences.

For example, a macOS user might be labeled as “trendy but impractical,” while a Linux user could be stereotyped as “overly technical” or “elitist.” Similarly, browser preferences might spark debates or judgments about privacy, efficiency, or mainstream conformity.

“Jason’s blatant computerism was evident when he refused to collaborate with Sarah, simply because she preferred macOS over Windows.

A computerist is someone who engages in or perpetuates discrimination, bias, or stereotyping based on another person’s choice of computer operating system, software, or browser. They may judge or treat others differently because of their tech preferences, often making assumptions about their personality, competence, or values.

For example, a computerist might mock someone for using Internet Explorer, assume all Mac users are creative professionals, or stereotype Linux users as overly technical and antisocial.

In a broader sense, a computerist could also describe someone deeply passionate about computer systems and their associated cultures, though this usage is less common.

“Don’t be such a computerist—just because I use Linux doesn’t mean I think I’m better than everyone else!”

 

 

The aesthetic of quality

Quote

Posted on by

Something that appears to be of high quality or sophistication but lacks true substance or craftsmanship. It’s the idea of presenting an illusion of excellence—through design, branding, or superficial elements—without the underlying integrity or value. In other words, it’s a deceptive or inauthentic display meant to mimic true quality, often relying on surface-level attributes rather than genuine merit. This can be seen in products, services, or even experiences that seem premium at first glance but ultimately fall short when examined more closely.